SAMPLE REPORT — For Demonstration Purposes Only
This report uses anonymized demo data to show what a real cohort report looks like after your class completes The $100 Week™.
Solid behavioral foundation — with a clear growth signal.
This cohort demonstrates strong Planning Orientation — students consistently accounted for future consequences when given time to deliberate. The development area is Impulse Control under social pressure. When the group was watching, decision quality dropped. That gap is your most valuable teaching moment.
1.6/2.0Planning Orientation
1.3/2.0Impulse Control
1.4/2.0Risk Awareness
1.1/2.0Resilience
Domain Breakdown02
Impulse Control
IC · Domain 1
1.3 / 2.0
Development area. 52% of students spent on Day 1 (Impulse purchase) and 43% followed the group on Day 2. The pattern suggests students know better — but act differently under time pressure or social observation. This is the most common profile for this age band.
Planning Orientation
PO · Domain 2
1.6 / 2.0
Class strength. 61% of students paid the Day 3 unexpected expense immediately — the highest-integrity response available — and 70% chose to save or goal-save on Day 5. This cohort thinks ahead when the stakes are clear. Leverage this in your debrief.
Risk Awareness
RA · Domain 3
1.4 / 2.0
Developing. On Day 4 (The Bet), students split almost evenly — 39% took the 50/50 risk, 48% declined. The students who took the risk while low on funds (below $15) represent the highest-priority debrief conversation. They took asymmetric risk without the capital to absorb a loss.
Resilience
RB · Domain 4
1.1 / 2.0
Lowest domain — priority growth area. Students who made poor early choices tended to compound them rather than course-correct. Day 3 and Day 5 data shows that students who spent heavily on Days 1–2 were significantly more likely to continue spending rather than pulling back. Pattern recognition is the skill to build here.
Profile Distribution — 23 Students03
ProfileDistributionCountShare
Financial Starter
14%
Emerging
313%
Explorer
417%
Developing
626%
Builder ← Median
522%
Thinker
313%
Advancing
14%
Leading / Exceptional
0—
Decision Patterns — Day by Day04
Day 1
The Drop
A
52%
B
30%
C
18%
Watch — IC
Day 2
The Pull
A
43%
B
35%
C
22%
Watch — Social
Day 3
The Blow
A
61%
B
25%
C
14%
Strong — PO
Day 4
The Bet
A
39%
B
48%
C
13%
Mixed — RA
Day 5
The Finish
A
30%
B
44%
C
26%
Strong — PO
Facilitation Insight05
Behavioral Interpretation · Generated from Session B7K2
Your class can plan — but social pressure breaks their execution.
The most consistent signal from this session is a gap between stated intent and observed behavior under social pressure. On Day 3 (unexpected expense) and Day 5 (final choice), students made strong, forward-looking decisions — 61% and 70% respectively chose the financially disciplined path. But when the group was watching on Day 1 and Day 2, discipline dropped sharply. This is not a knowledge gap. It is a knowing-doing gap — and it is the most common pattern we see in this age band.
The Day 4 risk data adds an important nuance: students who were already low on funds took the 50/50 bet at a higher rate than students with comfortable balances. This is the "nothing to lose" risk pattern — and it directly mirrors how adults fall into debt cycles. Naming this pattern explicitly in your debrief is the highest-leverage conversation you can have.
Suggested Debrief Prompts
On Day 2, nearly half the class spent money even when they were already low. What makes it hard to say no to the group — even when you know you should?
Some students in the class bet on Day 4 when they could least afford to lose. Why do you think that happens — in the game, and in real life?
Your class finished strong on Day 5 — most of you saved or set a goal. What would it look like to carry that same energy into Day 1 next time?
What Comes Next
This is one week of data. Imagine a full year.
The $100 Week™ is the entry point. The full WealthWise Kids™ platform includes a 36-lesson K–12 curriculum, a student fintech simulator, and a game-based assessment — all powered by the same FLIQ Score™ behavioral framework. Every product generates data. Every data point builds the picture.